Now, Hitler comparisons are so cliche and overused. Everyone’s Hitler these days. Personally, I think it’s encouraged by our leaders so as to muddy up the water and make it almost a joke in order to pave the way for our own version of Hitler. Ya know, a guy or gal who will hypnotize this country, identify a class of the population that is the source of the woes of the many, one who has a cult-like following, one who scares members of his own party that they silently jump the aisle. And so on.
There were two things this year that, coupled with Russia’s misbehavior (that they now, of course, blame on the U.S.), that remind me of the ramp up to WWIII. The first was the Beijing Olympics. Did anyone else notice that, during the opening ceremony, Matt Lauer sounded as if he was given a script written by Marx himself? Of course, clips of that are nowhere to be found on youtube, but what it reminds me of is. Has anyone seen the old Nazi Propganda Films when they hosted the 1936 Olympics in Berlin? Or how about their opening ceremony? Naturally, every host country will show-off how wonderful their country and culture is, but China and Nazi Germany did more than just show off. The strutted around like peacocks and made sure to say in non-threatening ways that they are not to be messed with by anyone and that they will rule the world. I don’t know. I’ve seen the opening ceremonies of all the olympics in my lifetime. Never have I gotten as much a creepy feeling as this year’s ceremonies have given me. I was at a bar and about three people other than me were heard make the same comparison to the 1936 Olympics.
The second thing that reminded me of the Nazis just happened this past week. It was the DNC. Now, for those of you who don’t know, in the interest of full disclosure I will tell you that I am a person who bought into the Liberal line as it was force-fed to me under the guise of an education in high school. That lasted for about a year until I realized what they taught felt opposite to human nature. So, I decided that since a proper education cannot be found in our schools and universities, I had to educate myself. I don’t remember how or why, but I was prompted either by myself or someone older and wiser to look up the definitions of communism, socialism, capitalism, democracy and a republic. I then began to compare modern Liberalism, Conservatism and Republicans and Democrats. It became clear to me that what a Liberal/Progressive believes is nothing less than cloaked socialism, in the least, and pure communism at most. I also learned that the idea that we have a democracy is a farce. But mainly I learned that most people who have a political opinion don’t know the difference between any of these things. Thank God most of them only opine and don’t vote.
Ok, back to the Convention.
The frenzy around Obama, and soon team Obiden, confuses, confounds and downright scares me. It almost seems to me that all Russia and China need to have happen is a sympathetic Marxist to become president of the U.S.A., making it easier for their shenannigans to occur AND for them to harm the United States directly with only a show of defense from our side. I know, I’m paranoid. You just wait and tell me who is paranoid and who is right. Anyway, while all the zombies awaited Barry’s arrival, many prominent democrats gave speeches. The strangest were from the Clintons; no fans of Barry. It almost seemed like Bill and Hill knew that they had a bead on them from high atop the stadium. And if they mispoke… BANG! Of course, I’m sure, there was no such bead on them. But, you know what I am saying. Anyway, the content of the speeches of all the speakers came staight from the Communist Manifesto
Then the big night came. B.O. was in the building. B.O. was going to speak. B.O. stinks no matter how well the words come out.
First of all, what’s with the friggin columns that were designed by Britney Spears’s set designer???? A) WHY the set to begin with? To distract us from the fact that you don’t have a real message because if you actually said what you wanted to do, no one would vote for you, Barry? And B) You couldn’t find anyone else to design it, especially after McCain mocked you for being no more important or better than Britney or Paris Hilton?
Anyway, the enthusiasm and the speech itself reminded me of, yeah, those people…
Now, I’m not for McCain. There is no candidate that I support. I could vote for McCain just to check the danger of Obama, but I am sick of voting for the lesser of two evils. What we need, and what I have been calling for more and more, is a viable third party. One that is more in line with the founding ideals of this country, not the Soviet Union. For, you see, while there once was a difference between Republicans and Democrats, there no longer is. The only difference is who will take us towards a Soviet gulag-existence faster. Will it be McCain or Obama? The answer is right there in front of our noses for he says it without saying it every day.
Educate yourself. Watch how pissed off you’ll become.
i was tracking with you til i got to the end and saw the low-blow picture. you were making sense, then the photo did exactly what you hate other people to do–muddy the waters with an ill-placed hitler analogy. what may to you seem like a socialist agenda IS NOT necessarily akin to hitler. c’mon; don’t just go for shock value; you onyl serve to weaken the many strengths of your argument.
the difference is that my analogy is more accurate than the overly used ones that i hate. and let’s not forget hitler didn’t run as “Hitler”.
and this isn’t interpretation as far as “what may seem” to me to be a socialist agenda. there is a clear definition of socialism. one only need look it up. and just because our government calls it something more pallatable, it’s still socialism. the more fervently it’s denied, the more you can rest assured that it is.
and if you still think i am not dead-on with this, please explain to me the Americanism and legality of this: http://www.kmov.com/video/index.html?nvid=285793&shu=1
socialism and Hitler analogies are different things. If you think Barrry O is socialist, that’s cool, i respect that. It’s the use of the image that I take issue with!
How about this: Does the use of the image fit a little more in light of this article?
“Missouri law enforcement being used as “truth squad” for Obama? Targeting people deemed to have misled? Prosecutors and sheriffs joining Obama’s “truth squad”. O.M.G. This is a frightening turn of events. Are they even allowed to do this? I know he wants to decimate the 2nd amendment…but now he’s going after the 1st? Who decides what is the “truth”? And the lies about Sarah Palin? They have nothing better to do in Missouri? They have no drug problems? Murders? Robberies? Rapes? This man just cannot be our president. This is sickening. So if McCain says something at the debate at Ol’ Miss that Obama thinks is “misleading” will Obama have him arrested? He’s already requested/demanded that PA television stations take down the NRA ads being run against him because they are “inaccurate” despite the attorney from the NRA sending a letter to the stations backing every claim. Must see TV….
http://www.kmov.com/video/index.html?nvid=285793&shu=1
AND FROM THE MISSOURI GOVERNOR….
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Contact: Jessica Robinson, 573-751-0290
Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign’s Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement
Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign’s Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement
JEFFERSON CITY - Gov. Matt Blunt today issued the following statement on news reports that have exposed plans by U.S. Senator Barack Obama to use Missouri law enforcement to threaten and intimidate his critics.
“St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the Obama-Biden campaign.
“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.
“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation about the election.
“Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent of the Sedition Acts - not a free society.”
TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1985
Prev | Next
§ 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
(3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws; or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of the laws; or if two or more persons conspire to prevent by force, intimidation, or threat, any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President, or as a Member of Congress of the United States; or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.
In addition,
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 241
Prev | Next
§ 241. Conspiracy against rights
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.”
***THE PRECEEEDING WAS TAKEN FROM AN EMAIL FROM A FRIEND. THE RESEARCH IS HERS UNLESS OTHERWISE CITED.
HERE’S AN OP-ED FROM A CANADIAN:
Barack “The Truth” Obama
Obama’s Marxism steps out of the shadows and into the public realm
By Judi McLeod Saturday, September 27, 2008
While American politicians were trying to perfume the $700-billion Wall Street bailout with the smell of roses, and while average Americans were worrying about their future, something even more disturbing was in the works this weekend.
Marxism stepped out of the shadows to make its first bold public outing in St. Louis, Missouri.
Prosecutors and sheriffs from across Missouri have teamed up with something called the Barack Obama Truth Squad, announced KMOV’s News 4, at 6 p.m.
“The Barack Obama campaign is asking Missouri law enforcement to target anyone who lies or runs a misleading TV ad during the presidential campaign,” News 4 reported.
“They want to remind voters that Obama is a Christian who wants to cut taxes for those making less than $250,000 a year,” said KMOV reporter John Mills.
The Barack Obama Truth Squad is an initiative based on pure unadulterated Marxism, a Marxism where the end justifies the means. Through the Marxist dialectic, Marxists are taught to lie and to accuse their detractors of lying.
Let it be remembered that on Saturday, Sept. 27, 2008, Barack Hussein Obama became the only truth.
Check out the words of St. Louis County prosecutor Bob McCulloch (here), who says …”whether it is directly attributed to the campaign or to one of the soft money operations, if they’re not going to tell the truth, someone should step in and say `That’s not the truth, this is the truth’.”
Strangely enough News 4 did not include Gov. Matt Blunt’s charge that Obama’s campaign was making an “abusive use of Missouri law enforcement” in their televised coverage of the Barack Obama Truth Squad.
“St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Clare McCaskill have attached the stench of police state to the Obama-Biden campaign,” Blunt said in an official statement released Saturday.
“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.
“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights.
“Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent of the Sedition Acts—not a free society.”
Meanwhile, the fawning mainstream media can add another first to what they consider their precedent-setting candidate: Obama is the first presidential candidate in history to resort to Marxism to get ahead.
Finally, Obama is telling the truth about something.
Judi McLeod is an award-winning journalist with 30 years experience in the print media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, her work has appeared on Foxnews.com, and Glenn Beck. She is the editor of Canada Free Press
Judi can be emailed at: judi@canadafreepress.com
this is the last hing i will add. this creeps me out using children for this crap and making them sing such words. i hate to bring it up, but our buddy hitler did the same thing. so did staling, sadaam, just about any other despot in history.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW9b0xr06qA
“I don’t want to belabor the point” (Katie Couric) but please watch this and stop denying the writing on the wall. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wy09UpI60F8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVjcRkeKFsc